697球!梅西五大联赛俱乐部进球超C罗******
北京时间2日凌晨,法甲联赛第21轮,巴黎圣日耳曼3比1击败蒙彼利埃,梅西打入球队在本场比赛的第二个进球,至此他代表五大联赛俱乐部的进球已经达到697个,超越了已经远走西亚的C罗的696球。在这样一场胜负几乎没有悬念的比赛中,梅西达成了又一个里程碑式的纪录。赛后他在个人社交媒体上晒出了进球后的照片,以此来庆祝这样一场胜利。
本场比赛,梅西打满全场,完成9次射门,其中3次射正、打入一球,赛后获评8.5分。这个进球是梅西代表五大联赛俱乐部在各项赛事中打入的第697球,其中巴萨生涯672球、巴黎生涯25球,他完成这697个进球用了835场,平均98分钟就有一球入账。这一数字从此超越了C罗,C罗曾代表五大联赛俱乐部在各项赛事中(总计918场)打入696球,其中代表皇马450球、曼联145球、尤文101球。如今,C罗已经成为沙特联赛豪门的一员,而仍在五大联赛效力的梅西则在“梅罗”这场长达十几年的竞争中完成了又一项数据的超越。
世界杯之后的梅西在逐渐恢复,上轮联赛对阵兰斯的比赛中状态不佳,赛后评分较低,对此大巴黎主帅加尔蒂埃表示:“之前和兰斯的比赛对梅西来说有更多的困难,今天我满意全队还有梅西的表现。当我们的中场已经适应了,如此一来梅西就有最佳的条件,他也展现出了自己最好的水平。球员并不是机器,梅西踢了一届很棒的世界杯,他肯定会出现疲劳。”
本场比赛打入一球后,梅西在本赛季代表大巴黎出战的23场比赛中已经直接参与了28粒进球,其中他自己打进14球,还有14次是助攻队友破门得分。在完成了代表五大联赛俱乐部进球数对C罗的超越后,梅西在今年还有望完成一些纪录的刷新,他距离代表五大联赛俱乐部700球的里程碑只差3球,代表国家队的100球纪录只差2球,这两项数据一旦全部完成,梅西职业生涯的800球里程碑就将达成。
此外,梅西职业生涯各项赛事的冠军总数已经达到42个,再夺一冠就将追平阿尔维斯的纪录,如果大巴黎能够在联赛中始终保持领头羊的领先优势,那么梅西的这一目标将在不久之后达成。
文/本报记者 王帆
中新网评:美国众议长选举“连续剧”暴露美式民主痼疾******
中新网北京1月9日电(蒋鲤)在15轮投票表决后,美国众议院议长选举这场“连续剧”终于落下帷幕,众议院共和党领袖凯文·麦卡锡最终成功当选第55任美国众议院议长。这是美国国会过去164年来耗时最久的一次议长选举记录,将美国“对抗式民主”的弊端暴露无遗。
资料图:美国众议院共和党领袖麦卡锡。中新社记者 沙晗汀摄
由于两党对立加剧、党派内斗、利益分配不均等因素,众议长选举陷入一场拉锯战。在此次众议长竞选中,美国民主党议员继续抱团,多轮投票中,一票不投麦卡锡,共和党右翼“强硬派”领头的约20人小团体也拒绝投票麦卡锡。
麦卡锡的当选之路一波三折,除了本人的“政治投机派”角色在国会不受欢迎外,与共和党内部政治分歧关系密切。
一方面,共和党党内反对者认为,麦卡锡对民主党态度过于软弱,无力对抗民主党控制的参议院和拜登政府,另一方面,因为共和党的多数优势微弱,党内一些影响力较小的派系的政治力量则被放大,有利于他们巩固自己的选票。
此外,党内反对者也认为,自己的选票没有换取更多利益,希望以此作为筹码换取麦卡锡更大的让步,比如让他们获得众议院重要委员会中的职务。
作为仅次于美国总统、副总统的政坛三号人物,众议院议长通常由众议院多数党领袖担任,选举几乎没有悬念。然而,麦卡锡此次为当选,不得不做出多个关键让步,其中可能包括恢复一项罢黜议长动议机制,使得众议长的权力被削弱,难以掌控众议院。
美国有线电视新闻网CNN称,麦卡锡在这场不合时宜的政治勒索中作出让步,这种绥靖政策只会让极端主义势力更加强大。
这场引发全世界围观的尴尬选举暴露出美国政治存在严重的对立和分化。在权力博弈思维的裹挟下,党派利益凌驾于国家和人民利益之上,美国两党相互拆台,陷入“为反对而反对”的无脑对垒。而即便是一党内,也会因为利益分配问题产生不同的小派系,相互对抗,选票变成了谋利益的工具。
从国会山骚乱到打破记历史记录的15轮众议长选举,“对抗式民主”让美国政治陷入瓶颈,长期对抗势必会让政客们丧失客观公正的判断能力,其政治阶层是否有能力治理国家也会引发质疑。
两党之争和党派内斗进一步放大了美国政治体制弊病,美国所谓的“民主”形象,让全世界大跌眼镜。鼓吹以选民利益为先的美式选举,变成了政客们利益置换的游戏,进一步彰显出美国“民主政治”日渐失能,不断极化的党争已使美国政治制度陷入死循环。
House speaker election reveals deep-rooted problems in U.S. democracy
(ECNS) -- The Republican leader Kevin McCarthy was elected as the 55th speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives after 15 ballots. As the most grueling House speaker election in the past 164 years, the election has highlighted the defects of the country’s "confrontational democracy".
The election once reached a stalemate due to intense partisan strife, inner-party struggle among the Republicans, uneven distribution of interests, and more. Democratic Party members forged a close alliance, refusing to vote for McCarthy, while about 20 Republicans also declined to cast ballots for the GOP leader.
Except for his unpopular role as a "political speculator" in Congress, McCarthy’s hard-won election can be attributed to turmoil within the Republican Party.
On the one hand, opponents in the Republican Party believe that the GOP leader's attitude toward the Democrats is too weak to confront the Senate controlled by Democrats and the Biden administration.
On the other hand, the political power of some less influential factions in the Republican Party has been amplified due to the Party’s weak majority advantage in the House of Representatives, which is conducive to consolidating their ticket warehouses.
Meanwhile, these opponents believe that their votes failed to win them more benefits, hoping to use this as a bargaining chip for McCarthy's further concessions, such as getting them positions in important House Committees.
As the third political figure after the President and Vice President of the U.S., the speaker, by tradition, is the head of the majority party in the House of Representatives.
But McCarthy has made many concessions in order to bring the ultra conservatives along, involving what’s known as the “motion to vacate,” a mechanism by which members can force a vote to depose the speaker. The reported concessions will empower individual members at the expense of McCarthy’s sway as speaker.
CNN thought the concessions he made during this unseemly political shakedown would only make the extremist faction more powerful.
This embarrassing election, which has drawn global attention, exposed the serious opposition and polarization in American politics. Both Democrats and Republicans put their interests before that of the country and its people, attacking and opposing each other irrationally.
Besides, different factions arise within a single party and confront each other because of the distribution of interests. Votes have become a tool to win more benefits.
From Capitol riots to the House Speaker election with record-breaking ballots, "confrontational democracy" has become a bottleneck of American politics. Long-term confrontation will surely impede politicians to think objectively and fairly while their capacity of governing the country will also raise doubts among the public.
Both parties’ struggle and infighting among the Republicans have further amplified the defects of the American political system, with its "democratic" image shocking the world.
The U.S.-style election, which advocates putting voters' interests first, has become a game of interest exchange among politicians. In addition, it further demonstrates the malfunction of American "democratic politics" and the constantly polarized party struggle that has trapped the American political system into an infinite cycle.